Stateful orchestration
Track the task through explicit states so interrupted work can be understood and resumed.
- Completion conditions
- Retry and step limits
- Recovery and cancellation
Solutions
Custom orchestration
Build a custom agent that coordinates approved tools and knowledge across a defined multi-step business task.
Workflow design
A reference workflow for the supported task. The specific tools, approval rules and operating limits are agreed during discovery.
Resolve the user identity, requested outcome and permitted data before creating a task state.
Output
A bounded task with a completion condition
Use approved context to propose a permitted tool call; constrain arguments to the tool contract.
Output
A validated action proposal
Apply action-level rules and required approvals outside the model, then execute with duplicate protection.
Output
A recorded tool result or review request
Check the actual system result, limit further steps and return evidence or an actionable exception.
Output
A confirmed outcome and traceable task history
Controls across the workflow
Evidence before expansion
These are proposed evaluation measures, not reported client results. Agree the baseline, sample and acceptance threshold before the pilot, then review the evidence with the workflow owner.
Before you commit
Build a custom agent that coordinates approved tools and knowledge across a defined multi-step business task. A first release should cover a named task with representative examples and an accountable owner.
Capabilities
Implementation components are selected for the task and confirmed in scope.
Track the task through explicit states so interrupted work can be understood and resumed.
Expose the smallest useful set of operations with validation outside the model.
Make behavior inspectable and configuration changes testable before wider rollout.
Frequently asked questions
A custom agent is an AI-enabled workflow that can maintain context, retrieve approved information, use tools, and complete constrained multi-step tasks under defined permissions and human oversight.
Only as much as the use case justifies. We start with the narrowest authority that creates value and increase autonomy only when evaluation, controls, and operational evidence support it.
Yes. We can expose approved CRM, ERP, ticketing, data, communication, workflow, or internal APIs as constrained tools with authentication, validation, and explicit read or write permissions.
Not always. Many workflows only need session state plus retrieval from authoritative systems. Longer-lived memory should be introduced only when it creates value and the privacy, retention, correction, and access implications are understood.
We create representative task and failure cases and evaluate outputs, tool selection, tool arguments, permissions, state transitions, escalation, latency, cost, and final workflow outcomes.
No. Compliance depends on the organization, deployment, data, contracts, controls, jurisdiction, and full operating environment. We design around identified requirements and avoid treating use of an AI architecture as certification.
Related
Start a conversation
Share the task, systems and examples of a successful result. We can define the first workflow, required controls and evaluation plan.