Pipeline security
Put the checks where the change happens, tuned so developers get a short list they can act on.
- Dependency and container scanning
- Static and secret scanning
- Build gating and exceptions
- Triage and routing
DevSecOps & Cloud Security
Security findings developers can actually act on.
Move security into the pipeline and the platform: dependency and image scanning that developers act on, secrets handled properly, infrastructure policy as code, and a cloud posture that is checked continuously.
Inside the delivery
A finding becomes a control when someone acts on it
Connect repository and platform checks to triage, ownership and verified remediation. Tool output alone does not establish that a risk has been addressed.
- 01
Code & dependencies
Inspect changed code, dependencies, images and infrastructure definitions.
Output
Findings with source context
- 02
Policy & triage
Assess exposure, severity and exceptions against agreed rules.
Output
An actionable remediation decision
- 03
Fix & verify
Assign the owner, implement the correction and retest the affected behavior.
Output
A verified fix or documented exception
- 04
Release & monitor
Apply agreed gates and continue checking drift and newly identified exposure.
Output
An auditable control history
Controls across the workflow
- Least privilege
- Secret handling
- Exception ownership
- Verification evidence
Decisions that shape the scope
- Which findings block release?
- Decide based on exposure and the agreed severity policy. Define who can approve an exception and when that exception expires.
- What is included beyond scanning?
- Scope triage, engineering fixes, infrastructure policy and verification separately. An installed scanner is not equivalent to a working remediation process.
- Does this provide certification?
- The engagement implements and documents engineering controls. Independent assessments and certifications require their own scope and evidence.
Before you commit
Is this the right engagement?
Security findings are generated but do not reliably reach the engineers responsible for remediation.
- What we need from you
- Existing scans, repositories, cloud policies, severity rules and the people responsible for accepting exceptions.
- How you accept the work
- Show how a seeded finding is detected, triaged, assigned and verified after remediation; test required release gates.
- Scope & alternatives
- This service implements engineering controls. It is not a certification, an audit opinion or a promise that all vulnerabilities will be eliminated.
Overview
A scanner nobody reads is not a control
Most teams already have security tooling. What they do not have is a triage path, a severity model that reflects their actual exposure, or a build that fails on the things that matter and stays quiet about the rest. Untuned scanning produces thousands of findings, teams learn to ignore the report, and the genuinely dangerous item arrives in the same noise as everything else.
- 01Pipeline scanning and gating
- 02Secrets and credential handling
- 03Infrastructure and policy as code
- 04Cloud posture and runtime monitoring
Capabilities
Engineering scope and deliverables
Select the work that addresses your constraint. Responsibilities and acceptance criteria are agreed before delivery.
Secrets and identity
Handle credentials as managed, rotatable material rather than configuration that happens to be sensitive.
- Secret storage and rotation
- Workload identity
- Least-privilege review
- History and leak remediation
Infrastructure and policy
Express the rules as code so they are enforced at deploy time rather than found later in an audit.
- Infrastructure as code scanning
- Policy as code enforcement
- Baseline and hardening standards
- Drift detection
Cloud posture and response
Watch the running environment and know what happens when something is found.
- Posture and configuration monitoring
- Permission and exposure review
- Runtime alerting
- Response runbooks
Pricing
Engagement options and pricing factors.
A proposal follows discovery and identifies the deliverables, access assumptions, review responsibilities and milestones. Third-party platform and model charges are identified separately where relevant.
Discovery and scope
Decide based on exposure and the agreed severity policy. Define who can approve an exception and when that exception expires.
Implementation
Deliver an agreed increment with the review and acceptance evidence described on this page.
Ongoing engineering
Agree a separate scope for maintenance, operational work or further development, including coverage and ownership.
Integrations
Selected for your environment
We select tools around your existing systems, data requirements and operating constraints.
CI/CD pipelines
Kubernetes
Terraform and infrastructure tooling
Cloud platforms
Identity providers
Observability tools
Frequently asked questions
Questions to resolve before starting
01How is this different from security testing?
How is this different from security testing?
Security testing examines the application and reports what it finds. DevSecOps is about where those checks run, which ones stop a release, who receives the finding, and how the platform is configured so classes of problem do not recur. The two work together.
02Our scanners produce thousands of findings. Where do we start?
Our scanners produce thousands of findings. Where do we start?
With triage and severity rather than more scanning. Deduplicating, filtering to what is actually reachable in your context, and routing to owning teams typically reduces the list by an order of magnitude and makes the remainder actionable.
03Will this slow our releases down?
Will this slow our releases down?
Only if the gates are set badly. Tuned properly, most checks run in parallel and only a small set of high-confidence conditions block a release. A pipeline that fails constantly gets overridden, which is worse than no gate.
04Do you help with compliance frameworks?
Do you help with compliance frameworks?
We implement and evidence the technical controls, and work to the requirements your compliance or audit function sets. We are engineers rather than assessors, so we do not certify or interpret a framework on your behalf.
05Can you work with our existing security tooling?
Can you work with our existing security tooling?
Yes, and usually that is the right call. Most environments have more tooling than they use well. The work is typically configuration, triage, routing, and gating rather than replacing products.
Start a conversation
Plan your DevSecOps engagement.
Tell us the current environment, the constraint you need to remove, and the outcome you need to reach. We will map the technical path from there.