Project and model structure
Establish naming, dependencies, source definitions and ownership around the analytical domains the team maintains.
Solutions
dbt
Move analytical transformation logic into a maintainable dbt project with explicit model grain, dependencies, tests and documentation. Connect releases to the way your analytics team works.
Platform architecture
dbt sits between available source data and the models consumed by analytics. The project should expose dependencies and assumptions, making changes reviewable before they affect downstream reports.
Declare source relationships and normalize inputs while retaining the meaning of source fields and identifiers.
Boundary: Source freshness, keys and ingestion ownership
Compose reusable transformation steps with explicit joins, grain and dependency references.
Boundary: Model contracts and transformation dependencies
Publish datasets around agreed business entities and measures for analytical consumers.
Boundary: Metric definitions and historical behavior
Run selected checks, review changes and document model dependencies through the delivery workflow.
Boundary: Test evidence and production run ownership
Across the system
Before choosing the stack
Vendor documentation informs platform selection; it does not imply a vendor partnership or certification.
Before you commit
Versioned analytical transformations, model dependencies and data tests within a supported data platform.
Capabilities
Select the relevant work after reviewing your existing environment. The proposal records deliverables, dependencies and ownership.
Establish naming, dependencies, source definitions and ownership around the analytical domains the team maintains.
Move selected SQL logic into reusable models while reconciling joins, historical treatment and downstream reporting behavior.
Add checks for meaningful data assumptions and document business context, not only the technical column names.
Connect model review, execution and releases to existing repositories and orchestration, including responsibility for failed runs.
Frequently asked questions
This engagement focuses on transforming data already available in the analytical platform. Source connectivity, extraction and raw loading need an ingestion path, whether existing or scoped separately.
It can provide a shared implementation, but stakeholders still need to agree definitions. We record metric ownership and reconcile competing calculations before publishing a reusable model.
No. Choose tests from the model’s assumptions and business impact. Keys, relationships, accepted values and custom business rules require different checks and responses when they fail.
Yes. Inspect adapter compatibility, dependencies, orchestration and custom logic, then validate a representative model set and downstream consumers before switching production runs.
Define whether the source corrects records, tracks versions or supplies late updates. The model design and backfill procedure must preserve the agreed business history and be tested against those cases.
Start a conversation
Bring the current architecture, the constraint and the outcome you need. We will identify the next useful increment and the evidence required to accept it.